<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yielder project site updated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chaoticjava.com/posts/yielder-project-site-updated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chaoticjava.com/posts/yielder-project-site-updated/</link>
	<description>The internet, design patterns, frameworks and Java</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 18:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chaotic Java &#187; Can someone please explain type inference to me?</title>
		<link>http://chaoticjava.com/posts/yielder-project-site-updated/comment-page-1/#comment-11668</link>
		<dc:creator>Chaotic Java &#187; Can someone please explain type inference to me?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 22:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chaoticjava.com/posts/yielder-project-site-updated/#comment-11668</guid>
		<description>[...] The question is, how many of these instances are actually there? And how many instances of these variable creations are eventually doomed to explicit definitions due to return values, method parameters, specific generic type requirements, or just because they don&#8217;t want to be declared final? This is an interesting question, and looking at Yielder as a test case, I wonder how much of it could be transformed to this new syntax, and how much is forced to stay explicit? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The question is, how many of these instances are actually there? And how many instances of these variable creations are eventually doomed to explicit definitions due to return values, method parameters, specific generic type requirements, or just because they don&#8217;t want to be declared final? This is an interesting question, and looking at Yielder as a test case, I wonder how much of it could be transformed to this new syntax, and how much is forced to stay explicit? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avah</title>
		<link>http://chaoticjava.com/posts/yielder-project-site-updated/comment-page-1/#comment-7060</link>
		<dc:creator>Avah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 07:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chaoticjava.com/posts/yielder-project-site-updated/#comment-7060</guid>
		<description>You mean using the already-made static function?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean using the already-made static function?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Ryan</title>
		<link>http://chaoticjava.com/posts/yielder-project-site-updated/comment-page-1/#comment-7058</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 06:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chaoticjava.com/posts/yielder-project-site-updated/#comment-7058</guid>
		<description>Can you please give examples of what using one of these iteratrors looks like from the caller&#039;s perspective?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you please give examples of what using one of these iteratrors looks like from the caller&#8217;s perspective?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

